Message-ID: <371475A6.A963AF35@ibm.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 07:01:58 -0400
From: Drew Cutter <cutterd@ibm.net>
Reply-To: cutterd@ibm.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.simulators
Subject: Re: FS2000... a few questions about floating scenery.
References: <7f1adt$9iq$1@news.tamu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.72.123.154
X-Trace: 14 Apr 1999 11:05:16 GMT, 166.72.123.154
Organization: IBM Global Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services
Lines: 5
X-Notice: Items posted that violate the IBM.NET Acceptable Use Policy
X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!europa.clark.net!204.59.152.222!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newsfeed2.us.ibm.net!ibm.net!news1.us.ibm.net!166.72.123.154
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.aviation.simulators:35689

I would love to see an article on comparing FS2000 vs propilot vs Fly
from a programmer perspective. Which code is written more sloppy , less
efficient , takes advantage of the video card , processor. Which of the
flight sim plugin works the best ? bug free ? WHo has a better chance to
compete with MS , Propilot or Fly and why ?
