Message-ID: <3626F564.C64EC290@connexus.net.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:27:32 +1000
From: Peter Russell <petre@connexus.net.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.simulators
Subject: Re: PP99 preview at combatsim.com = load of ****
References: <6vu42p$t00$1@news.ycc.yale.edu> <6vu8pk$bdk$1@excalibur.flash.net> <700a29$b5g$1@news.ycc.yale.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.34.169.219
X-Trace: 16 Oct 1998 17:21:43 -1000, 203.34.169.219
Lines: 33
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!digex!news1.radix.net!nac!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!newsfeed-in.aone.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!news2.melbpc.org.au!news.internex.net.au!203.34.169.219
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.aviation.simulators:25821

Hello Adrian

I didn't notice any name calling from Rev Karin except for questioning your
ability to discuss a software product you have never seen. (fair comment I would
say). Maybe you feel the need to throw insults at anyone who you think may
challenge your beloved MS.

Pete

Adrian Cybriwsky wrote:

> Rev. Karin Conover-Lewis (revkarin_spamkiller_@flash.net) wrote:
> : Alright, Adrian, why don't you enlighten the world with *your* review of
> : PP99? Oh - sorry, you haven't seen it yet, have you? Oops - I forgot - if
>
>
>         sigh.  more unfounedd accusations.  and to think he calls himself
> 'rev'.  for shame.
>
> : absence of features you would like hardly translates to the sim being a
> : piece of garbage.
>
>         listen you wanker:  i never claimed PP99 was a piece of garbage.
> i claimed the review was whorish--which it was.  again, im looking forward
> to pp99 and giving it an honest and informed run-down--as i do with every
> sim i buy, which in the past has included a crucifixion of SPP98--as much as
> that boils your blood, i know.
> now *plonk* away.
>
> - adrian



