Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: Toca2 sold out IMVS
From: Meiji <meiji@nospamdircon.co.uk>
References: <3713be46.3043583@news.supernews.com> <37145C55.EB708181@bigpond.com> <7f1nm6$mgo$1@plutonium.btinternet.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/2.04.01
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.112.58.160
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.112.58.160
Message-ID: <37148375.0@newsread3.dircon.co.uk>
Date: 14 Apr 1999 13:00:53 -0100
X-Trace: 14 Apr 1999 13:00:53 -0100, 194.112.58.160
Lines: 37
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.112.32.19
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!logbridge.uoregon.edu!isdnet!peer1.news.dircon.net!peer2.news.dircon.net!newsread3.dircon.co.uk!news.dircon.co.uk!194.112.58.160
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:85473

I also have no problem with the gfx, just a problem with the AI. Without 
dipping into the support classes I have found I can beat the AI on all 
tracks without too much practice. Why is it that both SBK and Toca 2, the 
finest *racing* sims of the moment are both lacking when it comes to AI 
strength. I'd like a NASCAR 2 style percentage scale so we can make them 
harder than "real life".

M


Zonkie <zonk@nospam.teletubbies.net> wrote in 
<7f1nm6$mgo$1@plutonium.btinternet.com>:

>In article <37145C55.EB708181@bigpond.com>, Mark C Dodd 
<mcdodddd@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>Save your money until they bring out an AI patch. I was thrashing the AI
>>cars after very little time practicing. As for the graphics......yuk!
>
>
>in what way?
>
>I have no pop-up (view distance set to 800m- perhaps some on the long 
straight 
>at snetterton), and the car modelling is great, as is the actual track 
detail 
>and placement of objects.
>
>
>the transparent glass & driver movements are pretty dman good, too.
>
>Z.
>
>
>
>
>Please remove NOSPAM from my email address when replying.
>
