Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: In defense of NASREV...
From: netlarry@xhisx.com (Larry)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:08:04 -0500
Message-ID: <1dp1hgr.11w0hwp9ukz43N@aln-65-109.jmb.bah.com>
References: <7bm43i$ib7$1@battery.awod.com> <7bmauc$1bue$1@nix2.kconline.com>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4 (unregistered)
NNTP-Posting-Host: aln-65-109.jmb.bah.com
Organization: Heller Information Services
Lines: 19
X-Authenticated-User: mactech
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!digex!btnet-peer!btnet!feeder.qis.net!nntp.abs.net!outfeed1.news.cais.net!news4.his.com!netlarry
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:81486

That about sums it up.

-Larry


Scott Moore <sidewayssixnospam@hoosierlink.net> wrote:

> 1- Ridiculous system requirements for all the cartoony graphics.
> 2- Lousy sound.
> 3- The spotter is blind.
> 4- Terrible car control.
> 5- The worst AI in any driving title of any kind.
> 6- No control under caution.
> 7- The stupid way pitting is handled.
> 8- Rrevved's famous "slow-motion" game engine.
> 9- Ineffective car setup capability.
> 10- Absolutely zero customizability.
> 11- a useless in car view.
> 12- It's expensive.
