Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: In defense of NASREV...
From: netlarry@xhisx.com (Larry)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:08:03 -0500
Message-ID: <1dp1hb6.16ioaoj1x9lbbN@aln-65-109.jmb.bah.com>
References: <7bm43i$ib7$1@battery.awod.com>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4 (unregistered)
NNTP-Posting-Host: aln-65-109.jmb.bah.com
Organization: Heller Information Services
Lines: 23
X-Authenticated-User: mactech
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.lightlink.com!news4.his.com!netlarry
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:81463

I have raced it.  For a lot more than 100 laps.

And the longer I race it, the more I hate Best Buy for not allowing
software returns.

NasRev is a horrible, horrible game.

NasRev can't hold a candle to Nascar 2.  The graphics are prettier, but
I don't race for graphics.  I race for realism and fun.  NasRev is far
too annoying to be fun.

There _is_ plenty of room for competing Nascar race games.  It's
unfortunate that NasRev is _not_ one of them.

-Larry

18Pack <18pak@yahoo.com> wrote:

> But I urge you nay-sayers to at least
> go out and race 100 laps or so and give the thing a chance. There's no way
> you can deny that the "racing experience" of NASREV isn't far ahead of or at
> least on par with NASPAPY.  And even if you have pledged your allegiance to
> NASPAPY there is plenty of room for more NASCAR titles.
