Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Path: news.jprc.com!newsfeed.sgi.net!newsfeed.nyu.edu!newsfeed.atl!uunet!ffx.uu.net!in5.uu.net!mailint03.im.hou.compaq.com!twisto.eng.hou.compaq.com!news
From: "Henrikki Hakkanen" <Henrikki.Hakkanen@compaq.com>
Subject: Re: Monza Banking in GPL 1.1 ?
Message-ID: <F8H8IE.MM2@twisto.im.hou.compaq.com>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: news@twisto.im.hou.compaq.com (System Administrator)
Organization: Compaq Computer Corp.
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:11:38 GMT
References: <g4HsvBAlnG52Ewvv@karisma1.demon.co.uk> <36E707C7.C9F74964@tpg.com.au> <36E68F51.5D0165DD@btinternet.com> <MPG.1151c958516ee70998968c@news.demon.co.uk>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
Lines: 26
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 155.61.72.189
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:79725

>> Bruce Kennewell wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Anyway, that is sufficient reason in my book to leave GPL as is and, if
>> > Papyrus wish to do anything, simply release new products based on what
>> > they have created with GPL.
>>
>> Absolutely, and put the banked oval for a 50's season. Then it would be
>> historically accurate and we could have some of those beautiful cars from
>> the period and Fangio would be the guy up front. To get the embedded oval
at
>> Monza, it would have to be '55, '56, '60 or '61. I guess 1956 would get
my
>> vote provided then modelled the non-championship GPs, mmm Brands Hatch,
>> though '57 with the Pescara circuit even longer the Ring would be good
too,
>> but no oval at Monza that year.


I really don't get you guys ... so what if it's historically incorrect, if
it's FUN?!?!
Or maybe it's just me ...

Hena


