Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: 199.455 at dega
From: netlarry@xhisx.com (Larry)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:09:34 -0500
Message-ID: <1dmy6gc.uva4g51b7gchsN@[156.80.65.113]>
References: <36B851FF.300BA2F1@bellsouth.net> <79dq5l$bmr@journal.concentric.net> <1dmqv4d.1oo7hx51m3pu67N@aln-65-134.jmb.bah.com> <36BA5BE6.E7FD855E@eznet.net> <79lma0$k4r$1@news-2.news.gte.net> <1dmwbvz.26x4g412wvcaoN@aln-65-105.jmb.bah.com> <0TBv2.1125$vW6.1197@weber.videotron.net> <79n3m4$rnu$1@news-1.news.gte.net>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4 (unregistered for 40 days)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.80.65.113
Organization: Heller Information Services
Lines: 12
X-Authenticated-User: mactech
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.lightlink.com!news4.his.com!netlarry
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:73628

I thought it might be wind too, but 30MPH back wind on the backstretch
means a 30MPH headwind on the front streatch.

Maybe because the front stretch isn't straight, the headwind doesn't
affect speed as much as the tail wind on the backstretch?

-Larry

Reaperman <bhms@gte.net> wrote:

> Frank you bring up something interesting here With a 30 mph wind it might be
> possible but 199 still won't be possible.
