Message-ID: <36B9EC6B.F6CEA29A@comcen.com.au>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 05:52:27 +1100
From: Byron Forbes <hosh@comcen.com.au>
Organization: HOSHUMUNGUS ENTERPRIZES
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: Is GPL good practice for N3?
References: <36b8e759.0@news2.uswest.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.56.244.95
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.56.244.95
Lines: 28
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!digex!btnet-peer!btnet!newsfeed.cwix.com!207.20.0.50!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!newsfeed.zip.com.au!news.syd.ausbone.net!nexus.comcen.com.au!203.56.244.95
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:72848

Simple one this. If you get good at GPL, then you will be REAL good at any other sim! :)

Don Hancock wrote:
> 
> Okay, I've got on my flame-retardant suit...  I'm sure it's been covered
> before, but dejanews is SUCH a pain in the ass (to me) so I'm gonna ask
> again:
>     We all know N3 is gonna use GPL's engine.  We also know that there's
> VERY little in common between a 1967 Lotus and a 1996 Chevy Monte Carlo (or
> 98 Ford Truck).  Would it be good practice to prepare for N3's new physics
> to use GPL?  From many posts by others it's superiority in modelling may be
> a BAD thing for those of us that still prefer NR99 et al for our "normal"
> racing fix.
>     Whaddaya think?  I PLAN on trying the demo, but haven't just yet.
> 
> "Gunner"
> ORSA Bronze #78 Navy Dodge

-- 
 Byron Forbes
 Captain of Team Lightning Bolt

 http://members.tripod.com/~HOSHUMUNGUS


    and

 http://www.frontiernet.net/~godsoe/bolt/home.htm
