Newsgroups: rec.autos.simulators
Subject: Re: AGP or PCI
From: netlarry@xhisx.com (Larry)
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:56:31 -0500
Message-ID: <1dlikk0.utnlgv3pd1lqN@aln-65-124.jmb.bah.com>
References: <19981129143616.10545.00002110@ng-ce1.aol.com> <73sgrh$ls0$1@black.news.nacamar.net>
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.4 (unregistered)
NNTP-Posting-Host: aln-65-124.jmb.bah.com
Organization: Heller Information Services
Lines: 17
X-Authenticated-User: mactech
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!digex!btnet-peer!btnet!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nac.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.lightlink.com!news4.his.com!netlarry
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.simulators:69006

Me too :)

It saves a PCI slot, so it's usefull :)

-Larry

MeatWater <meatwater@home.globe.de> wrote:

> Well, at this time AGP does not mean a thing for games. With a 133 it's no
> big deal anyway.
> 
> AGP uses an extra slot for the graphics board, so it doesn't have to share
> any bandwidth with other cards.
> 
> I use an AGP board as I need as many PCI slots as possible. I had a Matrox
> Mystique (PCI) before, and to be honest, I can't spot any difference in
> performance. Maybe I would  if I used the computer for video-editing or CAD.
