Message-ID: <36D07FDE.69A3@hotmail.killspammers.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:51:26 -0500
From: m w grossmann <dere_it@hotmail.killspammers.com>
Reply-To: dere_it@hotmail.killspammers.com
Organization: De Re IT Corp.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student
Subject: Re: Control tower w/o Class D?
References: <7a9jnu$976$1@fnord.nationwide.net> <7a9ls9$2mg$1@remarQ.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.240.212.147
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.240.212.147
Lines: 17
Path: news.jprc.com!newsfeed.sgi.net!nntp2.cerf.net!socal.verio.net!nntp.ni.net!peerfeed.ncal.verio.net!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!sanjose-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.inch.com!207.240.212.147
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.aviation.student:47646

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

> Sometimes during football season were asked to stay open
> past midnight for the Packers charter when they return from a late game.
> Airspace is established by regulatory action, so while we can extend our
> operating hours to provide ATC services, that does not alter the Class C
> effective times.  If we stay open until 2AM, then from midnight to 2AM we
> have a control tower in a Class E surface area.

And who foots the bill for the extra costs of staying open late to cater
to a football team? I'm laying odds that, just like their stadiums,
roadways and other services, the team gets taxpayers to absorb the
costs.

Cheers-

m w grossmann
