Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student
Path: news.jprc.com!newsfeed.sgi.net!nntp.abs.net!newsfeed.enteract.com!ix.netcom.com!mmallory
From: mmallory@netcom.com (Mark Mallory)
Subject: Re: Pitch-Airspeed, PWR-Alt: Bunk?
Message-ID: <mmalloryF26927.J21@netcom.com>
Organization: ICGNetcom
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
References: <4028231B016B6B73.877080881E6BAF82.A7B4AD31CAEFAD7F@library-proxy.airnews.net> <71tb49$e08$1@newshost.ihighway.net> <71vbek$rgi$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <mmalloryF20r0L.1pC@netcom.com> <727er7$e9f$1@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 20:32:31 GMT
Lines: 13
Sender: mmallory@netcom16.netcom.com
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.aviation.student:38143

Steve Peltz (peltz@jaka.ece.uiuc.edu) wrote:
: It does in an airplane, for the same reason it requires power to maintain
: altitude in level flight. I agree that my answer wasn't complete. However,
: the increased g-load IS the same thing as the acceleration around
: the circle.  If one requires extra power, the other one does as well.

You continue to confuse and mislead, Steve.  It's not the g-load that 
requires power, but rather the *induced drag* resulting from the g-load.   





