Message-ID: <3615495F.262E4941@uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 16:45:03 -0500
From: Brett Rabe <brett@uswest.net>
Reply-To: brett@uswest.net
Organization: US West !nteract Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student
Subject: Re: Can a C-150 do aileron rolls or fly inverted?
References: <36140756.5770935@206.103.79.92> <VA.000005c2.0048b1eb@airstrip>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.147.85.48
X-Trace: 2 Oct 1998 16:45:05 +0500, 204.147.85.48
Lines: 25
X-Report: Report abuse to abuse@uswest.net.
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!digex!news1.radix.net!tor-nx1.netcom.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-feed4.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed1.uswest.net!207.225.159.21.MISMATCH!newsmaster1.uswest.net
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.aviation.student:34217

Dave Mould wrote:
> Personally, I see no reason at all to break the rules in this
> respect - unless you are a test pilot exploring the envelope.  If
> you want to do aerobatics - rent or buy an aerobatic aircraft.  I
> have very little doubt that I could roll a C150 or a PA28 or a C310
> and get away with it - but I do not intend to do so (unless someone
> bets me an awful lot of money!)

Though the personal side is the most compelling reason
(the "I don't want to die stupidly" argument), it's worth
noting the additional stress put on your gyros that translates
into higher maintenance costs eventually.

Or am I wrong about that?

Brett

-- 
Brett Rabe                            Email :      brett@uswest.net
Systems Administrator - U S West      Phone :          612.664.3078
Interact - 3S                         Pager :          612.613.2549
600 Stinson Blvd.                     Fax   :          612.664.4770
Minneapolis, MN USA                   Pager : page-brett@uswest.net

Argue not with dragons, for thou art crunchy and go well with Brie.
