Reply-To: "DA" <mike_NO_CRAP_EMAILS_allen@airnet.net>
From: "DA" <mike_NO_CRAP_EMAILS_allen@airnet.net>
References: <7cmhna$t2u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7couvt$u0n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Subject: Re: rejected vanity plates
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:53:33 -0600
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
Message-ID: <dKw#cpOc#GA.206@newstoo.hiwaay.net>
Newsgroups: rec.autos.misc
Path: news.jprc.com!dca1-feed2.news.digex.net!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news.msfc.nasa.gov!news.hiwaay.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: tc05-216-180-32-180.dialup.HiWAAY.net 216.180.32.180
Xref: news.jprc.com rec.autos.misc:31440

Texas wouldn't let me have T1HS0N as a vanity tag, years ago.  Must have
been an intelligent clerk! (read in rearview mirror)
Alabama allowed HCN on a vanity plate for a BMW.  So much for their world
history knowledge...
When on interstate I saw CH4T00T.  Don't remember the state, I was too busy
trying not to wreck laughing!
David


