Newsgroups: ca.politics,talk.politics.misc
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!uni-heidelberg!lauren!gsmith
From: gsmith@lauren.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de (Gene W. Smith)
Subject: Re: Mr. Cramer's 'Evidence'
Message-ID: <1993Apr16.095620.19998@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
Sender: news@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (NetNews)
Organization: IWR, University of Heidelberg, Germany
References: <15317@optilink.COM> <1993Apr13.121723.20568@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de> <philC5HsII.GFt@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 93 09:56:20 GMT
Lines: 17

In article <philC5HsII.GFt@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
writes:

>Naw, I think you are. While both organizations may, on paper, support the
>abolition of the age of consent, there the resemblance stops.

>One supports the removal of a coercive law, the other a paper facade
>to "legitimize" sexual relations with children.

I get it.  One organization wants to abolish age of consent laws,
whereas in contrast the other wants to abolish age of consent laws.
This makes it respectable to belong to one organization, but not the
other.

-- 
     Gene Ward Smith/Brahms Gang/IWR/Ruprecht-Karls University 
               gsmith@kalliope.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
