Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!shearson.com!snark!pmetzger
From: pmetzger@snark.shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Subject: Re: Do we need the clipper for cheap security?
Message-ID: <1993Apr21.012011.27470@shearson.com>
Sender: news@shearson.com (News)
Organization: Partnership for an America Free Drug
References: <9304191013.AA10506@pizzabox.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 01:20:11 GMT
Lines: 17

gtoal@gtoal.com (Graham Toal) writes:
>
>In the UK, it's impossible to get approval to attach any crypto device
>to the phone network.  (Anything that plugs in to our BT phone sockets
>must be approved - for some reason crypto devices just never are...)
>

Whats the difference between a V.32bis modem and a V.32bis modem?

I'm not being entirely silly here: what I'm pointing out is that the
modems that they have already approved for data transmission will work
just fine to transmit scrambled vocoded voice.

--
Perry Metzger		pmetzger@shearson.com
--
Laissez faire, laissez passer. Le monde va de lui meme.
