Newsgroups: rec.autos,rec.autos.tec
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!eng.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!mad9a
From: mad9a@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Michael A. Davis)
Subject: Slick 50, any good?
Message-ID: <C5pAHE.G9q@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Sender: mad9a@fermi.clas.virginia.edu
Organization: University of Virginia
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 22:29:38 GMT
Lines: 9


     Chances are that this has been discussed to death already, and
if so could someone who has kept the discussion mail me or direct me 
to an archive site. Basically,
I am just wondering if Slick 50 really does all it says that it does.
And also, is there any data to support the claim.  Thanks for any info.

Mike Davis
mad9a@fermi.clas.virginia.edu
