Newsgroups: rec.autos
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews.watson.ibm.com!murthy
From: murthy@watson.ibm.com (Sesh Murthy)
Subject: Re: Bimmer vs Beamer
Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
Message-ID: <1993Apr18.192221.16726@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1993 19:22:21 GMT
Distribution: usa
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
References: <C5ny5y.1Dx@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Apr18.173934.14572@newsgate.sps.mot.com>
Nntp-Posting-Host: panini.watson.ibm.com
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Lines: 12

In article <1993Apr18.173934.14572@newsgate.sps.mot.com>, markm@latium. (Mark Monninger) writes:
|> Although not in direct response to the referenced article, just to set the 
|> record straight, Beamers are BMW motorcycles. BMW cars are Bimmers. Please,
                    ^^^^^^^
Huh!  I though Beamers were IBM employees :-)

|> let's get our terms straight.
|> 
|> Actually, some purists would argue that the only true Bimmer is a round
|> tail light 2002 or 1600.
|> 
|> Mark
