Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!newsflash.concordia.ca!cumin.telecom.uqam.ca!CC.UMontreal.CA!casgrain
From: casgrain@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Casgrain Philippe)
Subject: Re: what do y'all think of the IIvx?
Message-ID: <casgrain.734105219@alize.ERE.UMontreal.CA>
Sender: news@cc.umontreal.ca (Administration de Cnews)
Organization: Universite de Montreal
References: <1p5e0tINNojp@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU> <1prjquINNr0c@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1993 14:06:59 GMT
Lines: 23

jfinete@cats.ucsc.edu (Joseph Manuel Finete) writes:
>The IIvx...LCIII performance at a Centris 610 price. 
>And unless
>you're running FPU-intensive software, the 610 will blow the doors off the
>LCIII and the IIvx.

From the benchmarks I've seen (was that in MacUser or MacWeek?) the FPU-less
Centris 610 is _faster_ at floating-point operations (the kind of calculations
that get routed to an FPU) than a Mac IIfx!

And a Mac IIfx (68030 @ 40MHz + FPU) is _the_ fastest 030-based Mac.

Take note, of course, that benchmarks never tell the whole story... Get your
favorite program(s) and run them on both machines at the store.  They should
let you do that before you plunk down a hefty amount...

Virtually,
Philippe
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Philippe Casgrain              Etudiant-Chercheur      Casgrain@ERE.UMontreal.CA
Departement des Sciences Biologiques                      Universite de Montreal
#define disclaimer(caught) (caught ? "I wasn't even there!" : "I didn't do it!")
