{
  "run_id": "brand_feedback_minimum_viable_run_001",
  "created_at_utc": "2026-06-07T20:09:14.348640+00:00",
  "mode": "odyssey_executes_kimi_admitted_brand_feedback_minimum_viable_run",
  "product": "lovesac_sactional",
  "plan_source": "",
  "minimum_viable_run": [
    "feedback_cartographer",
    "theme_extractor",
    "evidence_triangulator"
  ],
  "evidence_manifest": {
    "manifest_id": "lovesac_sactional_feedback_seed_001",
    "product": "lovesac_sactional",
    "target_foundry": "market_meaning",
    "source_family": "brand_product_feedback",
    "evidence": {
      "comfort_positive": {
        "status": "promote",
        "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type."
      },
      "modularity_positive": {
        "status": "promote",
        "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes."
      },
      "fabric_cleaning_positive": {
        "status": "promote",
        "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself."
      },
      "delivery_setup_negative": {
        "status": "review",
        "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text."
      },
      "premium_price_objection": {
        "status": "review",
        "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality."
      },
      "universal_best_sofa": {
        "status": "quarantine",
        "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers."
      },
      "campaign_promise_validated": {
        "status": "review",
        "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue."
      }
    }
  },
  "role_outputs": [
    {
      "role_id": "feedback_cartographer",
      "status": "pass",
      "evidence_map": [
        {
          "evidence_id": "comfort_positive",
          "status": "promote",
          "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "modularity_positive",
          "status": "promote",
          "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "fabric_cleaning_positive",
          "status": "promote",
          "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "delivery_setup_negative",
          "status": "review",
          "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "premium_price_objection",
          "status": "review",
          "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "universal_best_sofa",
          "status": "quarantine",
          "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers."
        },
        {
          "evidence_id": "campaign_promise_validated",
          "status": "review",
          "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue."
        }
      ],
      "source_boundaries": [
        "promote",
        "quarantine",
        "review"
      ],
      "theme_ids": [
        "comfort_positive",
        "modularity_positive",
        "fabric_cleaning_positive",
        "delivery_setup_negative",
        "premium_price_objection",
        "universal_best_sofa",
        "campaign_promise_validated"
      ],
      "promoted_claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "feedback_evidence_map_ready",
          "claim": "The feedback evidence manifest preserves review, service, price, and campaign evidence types.",
          "anchors": [
            "promote",
            "quarantine",
            "review"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "qualified_claims": [],
      "review_claims": [],
      "open_questions": [
        "Should service/logistics evidence be analyzed separately from product-fit evidence?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "role_id": "theme_extractor",
      "status": "qualified",
      "theme_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "comfort_positive",
          "label": "Comfort is generally strong",
          "theme_type": "product_experience",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers generally describe the Lovesac sectional as comfortable for lounging and everyday use.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "modularity_positive",
          "label": "Modularity is a core advantage",
          "theme_type": "configuration",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers value rearranging seats and sides as rooms, family size, or use cases change.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "fabric_cleaning_positive",
          "label": "Washable covers reduce ownership friction",
          "theme_type": "maintenance",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Washable and replaceable covers are a recurring reason people tolerate the premium price.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "delivery_setup_negative",
          "label": "Delivery and setup are pain points",
          "theme_type": "service_logistics",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "Some negative reviews focus on shipping, many boxes, assembly burden, and support friction.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: service/logistics pain point, not direct comfort rebuttal"
          ],
          "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "premium_price_objection",
          "label": "Premium price creates expectation risk",
          "theme_type": "value_price",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The product is expensive, so comfort or service failures are more salient to dissatisfied customers.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: value qualifier, not product-comfort evidence by itself"
          ],
          "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "universal_best_sofa",
          "label": "Best sofa for everyone",
          "theme_type": "overclaim",
          "status": "quarantine",
          "claimed_finding": "Lovesac is the best sectional for every household and body type.",
          "corrections": [
            "overclaim: replace universal claim with qualified household-fit claim"
          ],
          "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers.",
          "promotion_vote": "quarantine"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "campaign_promise_validated",
          "label": "Campaign promise is fully validated",
          "theme_type": "brand_promise",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The review evidence fully validates campaign promises about adaptability, comfort, and lifetime value.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: campaign validation requires message/promise gluing checks"
          ],
          "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        }
      ],
      "sentiment_labels": {
        "brand_promise": 1,
        "configuration": 1,
        "maintenance": 1,
        "overclaim": 1,
        "product_experience": 1,
        "service_logistics": 1,
        "value_price": 1
      },
      "qualifiers": [
        "overclaim: replace universal claim with qualified household-fit claim",
        "scope: campaign validation requires message/promise gluing checks",
        "scope: service/logistics pain point, not direct comfort rebuttal",
        "scope: value qualifier, not product-comfort evidence by itself"
      ],
      "promoted_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "comfort_positive",
          "label": "Comfort is generally strong",
          "theme_type": "product_experience",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers generally describe the Lovesac sectional as comfortable for lounging and everyday use.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "modularity_positive",
          "label": "Modularity is a core advantage",
          "theme_type": "configuration",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers value rearranging seats and sides as rooms, family size, or use cases change.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "fabric_cleaning_positive",
          "label": "Washable covers reduce ownership friction",
          "theme_type": "maintenance",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Washable and replaceable covers are a recurring reason people tolerate the premium price.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        }
      ],
      "qualified_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "delivery_setup_negative",
          "label": "Delivery and setup are pain points",
          "theme_type": "service_logistics",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "Some negative reviews focus on shipping, many boxes, assembly burden, and support friction.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: service/logistics pain point, not direct comfort rebuttal"
          ],
          "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "premium_price_objection",
          "label": "Premium price creates expectation risk",
          "theme_type": "value_price",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The product is expensive, so comfort or service failures are more salient to dissatisfied customers.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: value qualifier, not product-comfort evidence by itself"
          ],
          "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "campaign_promise_validated",
          "label": "Campaign promise is fully validated",
          "theme_type": "brand_promise",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The review evidence fully validates campaign promises about adaptability, comfort, and lifetime value.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: campaign validation requires message/promise gluing checks"
          ],
          "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        }
      ],
      "review_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "universal_best_sofa",
          "label": "Best sofa for everyone",
          "theme_type": "overclaim",
          "status": "quarantine",
          "claimed_finding": "Lovesac is the best sectional for every household and body type.",
          "corrections": [
            "overclaim: replace universal claim with qualified household-fit claim"
          ],
          "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers.",
          "promotion_vote": "quarantine"
        }
      ],
      "open_questions": [
        "Should campaign-positioning claims be promoted only after non-review evidence is attached?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "role_id": "evidence_triangulator",
      "status": "qualified",
      "triangulated_themes": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "comfort_positive",
          "label": "Comfort is generally strong",
          "theme_type": "product_experience",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers generally describe the Lovesac sectional as comfortable for lounging and everyday use.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "modularity_positive",
          "label": "Modularity is a core advantage",
          "theme_type": "configuration",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers value rearranging seats and sides as rooms, family size, or use cases change.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "fabric_cleaning_positive",
          "label": "Washable covers reduce ownership friction",
          "theme_type": "maintenance",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Washable and replaceable covers are a recurring reason people tolerate the premium price.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        }
      ],
      "review_flags": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "delivery_setup_negative",
          "label": "Delivery and setup are pain points",
          "theme_type": "service_logistics",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "Some negative reviews focus on shipping, many boxes, assembly burden, and support friction.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: service/logistics pain point, not direct comfort rebuttal"
          ],
          "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "premium_price_objection",
          "label": "Premium price creates expectation risk",
          "theme_type": "value_price",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The product is expensive, so comfort or service failures are more salient to dissatisfied customers.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: value qualifier, not product-comfort evidence by itself"
          ],
          "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "campaign_promise_validated",
          "label": "Campaign promise is fully validated",
          "theme_type": "brand_promise",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The review evidence fully validates campaign promises about adaptability, comfort, and lifetime value.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: campaign validation requires message/promise gluing checks"
          ],
          "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "universal_best_sofa",
          "label": "Best sofa for everyone",
          "theme_type": "overclaim",
          "status": "quarantine",
          "claimed_finding": "Lovesac is the best sectional for every household and body type.",
          "corrections": [
            "overclaim: replace universal claim with qualified household-fit claim"
          ],
          "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers.",
          "promotion_vote": "quarantine"
        }
      ],
      "promotion_recommendations": {
        "promote": [
          "comfort_positive",
          "modularity_positive",
          "fabric_cleaning_positive"
        ],
        "review": [
          "delivery_setup_negative",
          "premium_price_objection",
          "campaign_promise_validated"
        ],
        "quarantine": [
          "universal_best_sofa"
        ]
      },
      "promoted_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "comfort_positive",
          "label": "Comfort is generally strong",
          "theme_type": "product_experience",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers generally describe the Lovesac sectional as comfortable for lounging and everyday use.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Review clusters mention softness, modular fit, lounging duration, and everyday use; comfort remains qualified by cushion choice and body type.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "modularity_positive",
          "label": "Modularity is a core advantage",
          "theme_type": "configuration",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Customers value rearranging seats and sides as rooms, family size, or use cases change.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Modularity is a product-identity feature and glues to configuration/value themes.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "fabric_cleaning_positive",
          "label": "Washable covers reduce ownership friction",
          "theme_type": "maintenance",
          "status": "promote",
          "claimed_finding": "Washable and replaceable covers are a recurring reason people tolerate the premium price.",
          "corrections": [],
          "rationale": "Washable covers support a maintenance/ownership-friction claim when separated from comfort itself.",
          "promotion_vote": "promote"
        }
      ],
      "qualified_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "delivery_setup_negative",
          "label": "Delivery and setup are pain points",
          "theme_type": "service_logistics",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "Some negative reviews focus on shipping, many boxes, assembly burden, and support friction.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: service/logistics pain point, not direct comfort rebuttal"
          ],
          "rationale": "Delivery, setup, and support complaints are real negative fibers but should not directly rebut comfort unless connected by review text.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "premium_price_objection",
          "label": "Premium price creates expectation risk",
          "theme_type": "value_price",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The product is expensive, so comfort or service failures are more salient to dissatisfied customers.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: value qualifier, not product-comfort evidence by itself"
          ],
          "rationale": "Price/value concerns qualify the market-meaning answer and should be tied to expectations and service quality.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        },
        {
          "candidate_id": "campaign_promise_validated",
          "label": "Campaign promise is fully validated",
          "theme_type": "brand_promise",
          "status": "review",
          "claimed_finding": "The review evidence fully validates campaign promises about adaptability, comfort, and lifetime value.",
          "corrections": [
            "scope: campaign validation requires message/promise gluing checks"
          ],
          "rationale": "Odyssey's brand model keeps message/promise under validation because campaign claims and review evidence do not fully glue.",
          "promotion_vote": "review"
        }
      ],
      "review_claims": [
        {
          "candidate_id": "universal_best_sofa",
          "label": "Best sofa for everyone",
          "theme_type": "overclaim",
          "status": "quarantine",
          "claimed_finding": "Lovesac is the best sectional for every household and body type.",
          "corrections": [
            "overclaim: replace universal claim with qualified household-fit claim"
          ],
          "rationale": "Universal best-for-everyone language erases body type, cushion preference, room layout, and expectation qualifiers.",
          "promotion_vote": "quarantine"
        }
      ],
      "open_questions": [
        "Should price objections be modeled as brand-positioning tension or purchase-friction theme?"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "handoffs": [
    {
      "from_role": "feedback_cartographer",
      "to_role": "theme_extractor",
      "handoff_artifacts": [
        "evidence_map",
        "source_boundaries"
      ],
      "present_artifacts": [
        "evidence_map",
        "source_boundaries"
      ],
      "compatibility_check": "preserve evidence types",
      "status": "pass"
    },
    {
      "from_role": "theme_extractor",
      "to_role": "evidence_triangulator",
      "handoff_artifacts": [
        "theme_claims",
        "qualifiers"
      ],
      "present_artifacts": [
        "theme_claims",
        "qualifiers"
      ],
      "compatibility_check": "preserve theme status and corrections",
      "status": "pass"
    }
  ],
  "audit": [
    {
      "gate_id": "evidence_type_gate",
      "status": "pass",
      "rationale": "Evidence types are preserved in the cartographer source boundaries.",
      "corrections": []
    },
    {
      "gate_id": "theme_grounding_gate",
      "status": "pass",
      "rationale": "Theme extraction preserves evidence ids, statuses, corrections, and rationales.",
      "corrections": []
    },
    {
      "gate_id": "overclaim_gate",
      "status": "qualified",
      "rationale": "Universal best-product claims are quarantined, while campaign and price claims remain review/qualified.",
      "corrections": [
        "keep campaign certainty and price objections out of promoted market-meaning synthesis until separately typed"
      ]
    },
    {
      "gate_id": "handoff_compatibility_gate",
      "status": "pass",
      "rationale": "Executed handoffs preserve required artifacts.",
      "corrections": []
    }
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "role_count": 3,
    "handoff_count": 2,
    "promoted_theme_count": 7,
    "qualified_theme_count": 6,
    "review_theme_count": 2,
    "audit_pass_count": 3,
    "audit_qualified_count": 1,
    "audit_review_count": 0
  },
  "admission_decision": {
    "decision": "brand_feedback_minimum_viable_run_admitted_with_overclaim_qualification",
    "passed_gates": [
      "evidence_type_gate",
      "theme_grounding_gate",
      "handoff_compatibility_gate"
    ],
    "qualified_gates": [
      "overclaim_gate"
    ],
    "review_gates": [],
    "next_action": "Add market_meaning_mapper and synthesis_auditor after separating product, service, price, and campaign claims."
  },
  "ticket_transformer": {
    "acronym": "TICKET",
    "expansion": "Topos Integration using Causal Kan Extension Transformers",
    "checks": [
      "typed_manifest",
      "subobject_classifier",
      "restriction_maps",
      "gluing_audit",
      "j_closure",
      "promotion_gate"
    ],
    "categorical_routine": "Kan-extension-style admission from a request-local artifact slice into durable Odyssey foundry state",
    "label": "TICKET(brand_product_prometheus_run)",
    "source_family": "brand_product_feedback",
    "target_foundry": "market_meaning",
    "foundry_expression": "TICKET(brand_product_prometheus_run) -> compose(market_meaning, evidence_argument, review_evidence) -> glue(product_feedback_refresh)",
    "fsql_surface": "FROM prometheus_runs SLICE BY family(\"brand_product_feedback\") TICKET BY target_foundry",
    "obstruction_policy": "quarantine biased samples, weak sentiment joins, and product/brand mismatches before promotion"
  }
}