Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!donb
From: donb@netcom.com (Don Baldwin)
Subject: Re: Ax the ATF
Message-ID: <donbC5sL69.F7I@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <C5sB60.7vI@cbnews.cb.att.com> <1r1173INNajc@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 17:13:19 GMT
Lines: 14

In article <1r1173INNajc@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM> 
dbernard@clesun.Central.Sun.COM writes:
>Even if it were a capital offense, the warrant was not even an arrest warrant,
>but a search warrant.  In other words, there was no evidence of illegal
>arms, just enough of a suggestion to get a judge to sign a license to
>search for illegal evidence.

It's hard to know what/who to believe.  However, the letter I received from
the BATF, in response to one I sent to Bentsen, said that there was a search
warrant AND an arrest warrant.

     don


