Newsgroups: rec.autos
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!cactus.org!boyle
From: boyle@cactus.org (Craig Boyle)
Subject: Re: The 1994 Mustang
Message-ID: <1993Apr27.064258.5129@cactus.org>
Organization: Capital Area Central Texas UNIX Society, Austin, Tx
References: <1993Apr24.145353.8006@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <C5zzD8.1Kt@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <C64Mux.Bpr@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1993 06:42:58 GMT
Lines: 27

In article <C64Mux.Bpr@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> callison@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (James P. Callison) writes:
>In article <C5zzD8.1Kt@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> marshatt@feserve.cc.purdue.edu (Zauberer) writes:
>>Disclamer: this is not a flame.. if you anger easily please go on.
>>>petebre@elof.iit.edu (BrentA. Peterson) writes:
>>
>>>The next Mustang will be Ford's highest profile car.  It attracts
>>>way more attention than the Camaro/Firebird because it's heritage
>>>is more embedded in the general public.  Don't lie to yourself and
>>>believe Ford will forfeit that.
>>
>>FYI: they already did.
>
>Oh, really. When?
>
>>Too bad that the current Mustang can't even compete with the new
>>Camaro without using an active imagination.
>
>The '93 Mustang Cobra can. Check it out.

So you think a 93 Mustang Cobra can match the performance of a new Z28??
Interesting belief! 

Craig

(who neither owns, nor wants to own any GM or Ford product)

Craig
