Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!constellation!darkside!okcforum.osrhe.edu!bil
From: bil@okcforum.osrhe.edu (Bill Conner)
Subject: Re: What's a shit shoveler to do? (was Re: Amusing atheists and)
Message-ID: <C5v7to.3Fr@darkside.osrhe.uoknor.edu>
Sender: news@darkside.osrhe.uoknor.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: okcforum.osrhe.edu
Organization: Okcforum Unix Users Group
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL9]
References: <11863@vice.ICO.TEK.COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 03:17:48 GMT
Lines: 20

Robert Beauchaine (bobbe@vice.ICO.TEK.COM) wrote:
: >

:   Precisely my position.  

:   As a newbie, I tried the point-by-point approach to debate with
:   these types.  It wasted both my time and my lifespan.  Ignoring
:   them is not an option, since they don't go away, and doing so
:   would leave one with large stretches of complete anonymity in this
:   group.

Bob,

I've posted here long enough to see your name a few times, but I
can't recall any point by point approach to anything you've
contributed. But I'm old (probably senile) and I may have just
forgotten, if you could post an example of your invincible logic, it
might jog my memory.

Bill
