Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Path: cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!das-news.harvard.edu!noc.near.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!apple!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!sandvik-kent.apple.com!user
From: sandvik@newton.apple.com (Kent Sandvik)
Subject: Re: Objective morality (was Re: <Political Atheists?)
Sender: news@gallant.apple.com
Message-ID: <sandvik-160493120146@sandvik-kent.apple.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 19:02:33 GMT
References: <1q0fngINNahu@gap.caltech.edu> <1q28ok$dt7@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1q56olINN8g9@gap.caltech.edu> <1q5gnr$s0g@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1q8m6kINNj4i@gap.caltech.edu> <1qcqfv$r05@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1ql7utINN5sg@gap.caltech.edu> <1qlci4$bqp@fido.asd.sgi.com> <1qlf7gINN8sn@gap.caltech.edu>
Organization: Cookamunga Tourist Bureau
Followup-To: alt.atheism
Lines: 14

In article <1qlf7gINN8sn@gap.caltech.edu>, keith@cco.caltech.edu (Keith
Allan Schneider) wrote:
> Which type of morality are you talking about?  In a natural sense, it
> is not at all immoral to harm another species (as long as it doesn't
> adversely affect your own, I guess).

Hehehe, so you say, but this objective morality somehere tells you 
that this is not the case, and you don't know all the rules of such
transcendental game systems...

Cheers,
Kent
---
sandvik@newton.apple.com. ALink: KSAND -- Private activities on the net.
